<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guyberes.com/2010/05/25/the-assassination-of-mahmoud-al-mabhouh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guyberes.com/2010/05/25/the-assassination-of-mahmoud-al-mabhouh/</link>
	<description>IT consultant, social democrat, ALP member and sometime writer. Australian Londoner.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 12:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2010/05/25/the-assassination-of-mahmoud-al-mabhouh/comment-page-1/#comment-26854</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 11:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/?p=452#comment-26854</guid>
		<description>Indeed - the actual assassination seems to be no longer up for discussion. 

I don&#039;t think Julie Bishop is cut out for either Foreign Affairs or the deputy leadership, quite frankly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed &#8211; the actual assassination seems to be no longer up for discussion. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Julie Bishop is cut out for either Foreign Affairs or the deputy leadership, quite frankly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: armagny</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2010/05/25/the-assassination-of-mahmoud-al-mabhouh/comment-page-1/#comment-26740</link>
		<dc:creator>armagny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 03:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/?p=452#comment-26740</guid>
		<description>I suspect Bishop was correct first time around, which, if she knew that because of her office, might raise questions about national security law et al.

Also may mean she&#039;s not telling the truth second time around, or is saying something she doesn&#039;t believe to be true because of the adverse reaction.

I think the issue - and the one that is being cleverly slipped around by the simplistic media ramble - is that they were used to kill someone, to perform a state assassination, and in a way that put Australian citizens&#039; lives in danger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect Bishop was correct first time around, which, if she knew that because of her office, might raise questions about national security law et al.</p>
<p>Also may mean she&#8217;s not telling the truth second time around, or is saying something she doesn&#8217;t believe to be true because of the adverse reaction.</p>
<p>I think the issue &#8211; and the one that is being cleverly slipped around by the simplistic media ramble &#8211; is that they were used to kill someone, to perform a state assassination, and in a way that put Australian citizens&#8217; lives in danger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

