<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A wafer-thin Coalition?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guyberes.com/2008/12/06/a-wafer-thin-coalition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/12/06/a-wafer-thin-coalition/</link>
	<description>On Sunday ring road supermarket. No killing moths or putting boiling water on the ants.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:10:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/12/06/a-wafer-thin-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/12/06/a-wafer-thin-coalition/#comment-4317</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re probably right, although if the polls keep on keeping on the way they have been, I am sure that folks on the Opposition benches are going to get skittish. 

Admittedly, its a tough ask ahead of the Coalition. I am sure that if a &quot;Rudd Years&quot; style retrospective is done a decade from now, a lot of Libs would be coming out admitting that back in 2008 they thought knocking Labor out after just one term was going to be a close to impossible mission, regardless of who was leading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re probably right, although if the polls keep on keeping on the way they have been, I am sure that folks on the Opposition benches are going to get skittish. </p>
<p>Admittedly, its a tough ask ahead of the Coalition. I am sure that if a &#8220;Rudd Years&#8221; style retrospective is done a decade from now, a lot of Libs would be coming out admitting that back in 2008 they thought knocking Labor out after just one term was going to be a close to impossible mission, regardless of who was leading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Bath</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/12/06/a-wafer-thin-coalition/comment-page-1/#comment-4313</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Bath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/12/06/a-wafer-thin-coalition/#comment-4313</guid>
		<description>Turnbull gives the libs a hope of moving from the nasty Howard way, and from the vacuous Nelson way, neither of which are politically viable at the moment.  If the libs don&#039;t get behind Turnbull, if only because his vision offers their best chance of re-election, then they are too stupid and deserve to be slaughtered come the next election.

The problem is that the neocons in the libs might be pushing for a Costello (or worse, Minchin) leadership..... too horrible to contemplate.

Let&#039;s face it, the Libs have to get back those voters in the centre, and Turnbull certainly has a brain, and has not proven himself a nasty piece of work... so he is probably their only hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turnbull gives the libs a hope of moving from the nasty Howard way, and from the vacuous Nelson way, neither of which are politically viable at the moment.  If the libs don&#8217;t get behind Turnbull, if only because his vision offers their best chance of re-election, then they are too stupid and deserve to be slaughtered come the next election.</p>
<p>The problem is that the neocons in the libs might be pushing for a Costello (or worse, Minchin) leadership&#8230;.. too horrible to contemplate.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s face it, the Libs have to get back those voters in the centre, and Turnbull certainly has a brain, and has not proven himself a nasty piece of work&#8230; so he is probably their only hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

