<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Those terrible &#8220;d&#8221; words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/</link>
	<description>On Sunday ring road supermarket. No killing moths or putting boiling water on the ants.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4281</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/#comment-4281</guid>
		<description>Yes, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4277</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/#comment-4277</guid>
		<description>like the vote on the infrastructure fund bill in the senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>like the vote on the infrastructure fund bill in the senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4275</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 08:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/#comment-4275</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s certainly looking like Turnbull&#039;s control over his party room is &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24754820-2702,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fraying&lt;/A&gt; at the edges as parliament draws to a close for 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s certainly looking like Turnbull&#8217;s control over his party room is <a HREF="http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24754820-2702,00.html" rel="nofollow">fraying</a> at the edges as parliament draws to a close for 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GB</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4235</link>
		<dc:creator>GB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/#comment-4235</guid>
		<description>Sorry for my long-winded post - I just ramble on when I&#039;ve had a beer.  One index today records a big drop in the rate of inflation.  So there&#039;s really no economic reason not to spend.  Paul Krugman has a good piece in the NY Times today.

When are people going to see Malcolm Turnbull for what he is - a big bag of wind.  He knows the government has to spend as much as we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for my long-winded post &#8211; I just ramble on when I&#8217;ve had a beer.  One index today records a big drop in the rate of inflation.  So there&#8217;s really no economic reason not to spend.  Paul Krugman has a good piece in the NY Times today.</p>
<p>When are people going to see Malcolm Turnbull for what he is &#8211; a big bag of wind.  He knows the government has to spend as much as we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4233</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 07:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/#comment-4233</guid>
		<description>GB, you&#039;re right there, the Libs are a complete jumble at the moment on economics. They&#039;re being undermined by Julie Bishop&#039;s lack of authority in the Shadow Treasury role as well.

Matthew, I think the Rudd Government should continue to assess things on a month-by-month basis in relation to the state of the budget and indeed the global situation. I am not convinced we are there yet, but depending on how things develop, I agree with the government that spending measures that take the budget into deficit may well be justified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GB, you&#8217;re right there, the Libs are a complete jumble at the moment on economics. They&#8217;re being undermined by Julie Bishop&#8217;s lack of authority in the Shadow Treasury role as well.</p>
<p>Matthew, I think the Rudd Government should continue to assess things on a month-by-month basis in relation to the state of the budget and indeed the global situation. I am not convinced we are there yet, but depending on how things develop, I agree with the government that spending measures that take the budget into deficit may well be justified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4228</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 00:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>Should the Australian situation be confused with the global situation and  does very tiny positive growth warrant a deficit budget?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should the Australian situation be confused with the global situation and  does very tiny positive growth warrant a deficit budget?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GB</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4215</link>
		<dc:creator>GB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/#comment-4215</guid>
		<description>Keynesian social democrats shouldn&#039;t have had all that much of a problem with Rudd being an economic conservative - at the top of the economic cycle, that is.

There seem to be  two reasons to have a surplus.  When the economy is humming along, not injecting money into the economy and adding to inflation makes sense (although apparently there&#039;s no clear-cut link between running a deficit and inflation).  Second, the government doesn&#039;t have to pay interest on its bonds and so saves money if it can pay for things out of a balaced budget (though governments should be paying tiny amounts of interest at the moment as investors flood into safe goverment bonds).  

The third reason seems to have something to do with Liberal ideology/Protestant frugality and self-denial - that is, the sense that a balanced budget means a good government running a tight ship whereas a deficit means sloppiness and permissiveness.

Why don&#039;t business people and commentators - who are all over the media saying running a deficity is absolutely the right thing to do - put aside their Tory prejudices for once and say the Libs are talking utter nonsense.  After all isn&#039;t capitalism supposed to be on the precipiece?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keynesian social democrats shouldn&#8217;t have had all that much of a problem with Rudd being an economic conservative &#8211; at the top of the economic cycle, that is.</p>
<p>There seem to be  two reasons to have a surplus.  When the economy is humming along, not injecting money into the economy and adding to inflation makes sense (although apparently there&#8217;s no clear-cut link between running a deficit and inflation).  Second, the government doesn&#8217;t have to pay interest on its bonds and so saves money if it can pay for things out of a balaced budget (though governments should be paying tiny amounts of interest at the moment as investors flood into safe goverment bonds).  </p>
<p>The third reason seems to have something to do with Liberal ideology/Protestant frugality and self-denial &#8211; that is, the sense that a balanced budget means a good government running a tight ship whereas a deficit means sloppiness and permissiveness.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t business people and commentators &#8211; who are all over the media saying running a deficity is absolutely the right thing to do &#8211; put aside their Tory prejudices for once and say the Libs are talking utter nonsense.  After all isn&#8217;t capitalism supposed to be on the precipiece?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4203</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/#comment-4203</guid>
		<description>It is certainly a little ambiguous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is certainly a little ambiguous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4201</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 09:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/#comment-4201</guid>
		<description>then is the term &quot;economic conservatism&quot; is a problematic term to use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then is the term &#8220;economic conservatism&#8221; is a problematic term to use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/comment-page-1/#comment-4197</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 05:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/11/26/those-terrible-d-words/#comment-4197</guid>
		<description>To be honest I am not sure whether &quot;economic conservatism&quot; necessarily implies &quot;consistent budget surpluses regardless of the conditions&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest I am not sure whether &#8220;economic conservatism&#8221; necessarily implies &#8220;consistent budget surpluses regardless of the conditions&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
