<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A more interactive democracy for a modern Australia</title>
	<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/</link>
	<description>Reflections on social democracy, economics, the media, and spin in an age of incorrigible cynicism.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 08:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-699</guid>
		<description>It wouldn't necessarily mean that a compromise viewpoint would be reached in every scenario. It might mean, for example, that one's preferred option in one policy scenario is adopted at the expense of one's preferred option in another. Unless a "middle ground" position is proposed as part of the "ballot" (or a secondary vote) there would be no simple method for ensuring that a compromise position has the support of the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It wouldn&#8217;t necessarily mean that a compromise viewpoint would be reached in every scenario. It might mean, for example, that one&#8217;s preferred option in one policy scenario is adopted at the expense of one&#8217;s preferred option in another. Unless a &#8220;middle ground&#8221; position is proposed as part of the &#8220;ballot&#8221; (or a secondary vote) there would be no simple method for ensuring that a compromise position has the support of the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 22:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>How would this compromise be arrive at?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would this compromise be arrive at?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 21:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-681</guid>
		<description>Everyone. We can only hope that competing special interests result in outcomes that at least to some extent reflects a compromised viewpoint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone. We can only hope that competing special interests result in outcomes that at least to some extent reflects a compromised viewpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 06:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-617</guid>
		<description>What do you mean by people? mainstream or special interests?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean by people? mainstream or special interests?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Well that's a good question - as I mentioned piloting a form of direct democracy in this way would undermine our conventional doctrine of representative politics. I would still question whether or not it might be time that our politicians allowed the people a bit more control over the affairs of the nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that&#8217;s a good question - as I mentioned piloting a form of direct democracy in this way would undermine our conventional doctrine of representative politics. I would still question whether or not it might be time that our politicians allowed the people a bit more control over the affairs of the nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-470</guid>
		<description>Then there is the question of whether people will participate or will they be apethetic. I thought we vote the politicians in which means placing trust and faith in a person to hopefully act in our interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then there is the question of whether people will participate or will they be apethetic. I thought we vote the politicians in which means placing trust and faith in a person to hopefully act in our interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Between radio, television and the Internet, I am sure a medium that could be found to provide access to just about everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Between radio, television and the Internet, I am sure a medium that could be found to provide access to just about everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gee Kwun Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://guyberes.com/2008/04/21/a-more-interactive-democracy-for-a-modern-australia/#comment-467</guid>
		<description>then there would be a question of people's access to the mediums of which to participate in such reality tv style politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then there would be a question of people&#8217;s access to the mediums of which to participate in such reality tv style politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
