<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: History, belatedly made</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guyberes.com/2008/02/13/history-belatedly-made/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/02/13/history-belatedly-made/</link>
	<description>On Sunday ring road supermarket. No killing moths or putting boiling water on the ants.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/02/13/history-belatedly-made/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/02/13/history-belatedly-made/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re probably pretty close to the mark there, I think, particularly in relation to the &quot;reactionary&quot; angle. One always got the impression that the ideological zealots in his party were probably influencing him to a great extent and driving him to push certain agendas. Once most of these firmly ideological steps were taken (e.g. WorkChoices, the apology), there was little resiling from them due to something in the man&#039;s nature. 

Perhaps Howard also developed a bit of a complex about reversing political positions taken previously, again arguably partially a reaction to events, such as Keating&#039;s &quot;L-A-W&quot; tax cuts, and public anger regarding his own change of tack in relation to the GST, which almost cost him the election in 1999.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re probably pretty close to the mark there, I think, particularly in relation to the &#8220;reactionary&#8221; angle. One always got the impression that the ideological zealots in his party were probably influencing him to a great extent and driving him to push certain agendas. Once most of these firmly ideological steps were taken (e.g. WorkChoices, the apology), there was little resiling from them due to something in the man&#8217;s nature. </p>
<p>Perhaps Howard also developed a bit of a complex about reversing political positions taken previously, again arguably partially a reaction to events, such as Keating&#8217;s &#8220;L-A-W&#8221; tax cuts, and public anger regarding his own change of tack in relation to the GST, which almost cost him the election in 1999.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran</title>
		<link>http://guyberes.com/2008/02/13/history-belatedly-made/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 09:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guyberes.com/2008/02/13/history-belatedly-made/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I have no conception whatsoever of what the former Prime Minister thought about these things.  That is to say, I don&#039;t think he was perhaps necessarily even that hardcore in a lot of his positions, but that once taken, they were adhered to without any room for discussion (until discarded).

I think basically he was a reactionary, in the truest sense of reacting not proposing.  His industrial relations agenda was a reaction against most of 20th century laborism.  Not like he invented that agenda or anything.

But mostly, I think that Howard was someone who like Richard Nixon, was overwhelmed by bitterness.  By the time he won office as Prime Minister, he was twisted by the real and perceived slights of his career and life to that point.  I don&#039;t think big-heartedness was ever likely to be part of the equation.  I think his actual opinions about the original inhabitants of this country were probably, at worst, summed up by total indifference.  But his culture-war friends in the media etc. probably bolstered a lot of his more resentful attitudes, and so it goes, and so it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no conception whatsoever of what the former Prime Minister thought about these things.  That is to say, I don&#8217;t think he was perhaps necessarily even that hardcore in a lot of his positions, but that once taken, they were adhered to without any room for discussion (until discarded).</p>
<p>I think basically he was a reactionary, in the truest sense of reacting not proposing.  His industrial relations agenda was a reaction against most of 20th century laborism.  Not like he invented that agenda or anything.</p>
<p>But mostly, I think that Howard was someone who like Richard Nixon, was overwhelmed by bitterness.  By the time he won office as Prime Minister, he was twisted by the real and perceived slights of his career and life to that point.  I don&#8217;t think big-heartedness was ever likely to be part of the equation.  I think his actual opinions about the original inhabitants of this country were probably, at worst, summed up by total indifference.  But his culture-war friends in the media etc. probably bolstered a lot of his more resentful attitudes, and so it goes, and so it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
